You are strongly cautioned that the movie is sometimes intense. It contains violence, dark moments and visual images capable of scaring or disturbing younger children, particularly those who haven't read the book. At 151 minutes, the movie is also too long for younger children.

What age is Harry Potter book 1 appropriate for?

Like most milestones, there is no “right age.” It all depends on the kid—and the parents. But there are a few age-related guidelines to take into consideration: From a technical standpoint, Harry Potter is categorized as a middle-grade read, which typically encompasses 9–to–12-year-olds.

What age should I let my child watch Harry Potter?

Age 8+ This is a great age to begin.

Is Harry Potter 1 PG 13?

MPAA rating: PG (Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone, Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets, Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, and Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince) and PG-13 (Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1, ...

Is Harry Potter suitable for a 5 year old?

Absolutely not! There are plenty of children (my own included) who aren't ready to read Harry Potter independently or even aloud at that age, or who are ready much sooner. The books wouldn't frighten some kids who are even younger, but would make some kids uncomfortable years later.

Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone (2001) Official Trailer - Daniel Radcliffe Movie HD

Is Harry Potter 1 suitable for a 7 year old?

You are strongly cautioned that the movie is sometimes intense. It contains violence, dark moments and visual images capable of scaring or disturbing younger children, particularly those who haven't read the book. At 151 minutes, the movie is also too long for younger children.

Which Harry Potter movie is the least scary?

Considering most of the characters are 11 years old, it's unsurprising that Sorcerer's Stone is a (mostly) scare-free affair. There are a few moments that are appropriately scary for young children, such as Harry, Ron, and Hermione's encounters with the troll and Fluffy, but nothing too nightmarish.

Is the first Harry Potter movie PG?

The frightening aspects of the book are in full force in the film, and its PG rating (for some scary moments) should be taken seriously.

Why is Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone rated PG?

Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone [2001] [PG] - 0.4. 2 | Parents' Guide & Review | Kids-In-Mind.com. SEX/NUDITY 0 - None. VIOLENCE/GORE 4 - A woman is killed by a wizard; we see a flash of light shooting from his wand and hear the woman scream.

Why was Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince not PG-13?

Although it is milder in terms of scary images and violence than other Harry Potter movies, this movie is a little darker and has higher levels of emotion and romance than its predecessors. It also has more mature themes.

Is Harry Potter middle-grade or ya?

They can certainly be read and enjoyed by young adults. They can also be read and enjoyed by adults. However, both Harry Potter and Percy Jackson are Middle-Grade books.

Is Harry Potter rated R?

Rated PG-13 for sequences of fantasy violence and frightening images.

What grade level is Harry Potter?

If you look up Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone in English, it's various grade level recommendations are: Grades 4-6, Lexile 880L (which is 50th percentile at the end of 4th grade), Guided Reading Level V (end of 5th grade), DRA Level 40-50 (4th-5th grade), or ACR 5.5 (mid 5th grade).

Why is Harry Potter rated 12?

Why did you rate it 12A? The latest Harry Potter film is much darker and scarier than the previous three, which were all classified PG (Parental Guidance, suitable for people aged around 8 or older).

What age is Percy Jackson for?

The Percy Jackson series [we're talking about the first series, not its companion series Heroes of Olympus] is generally targeted and marketed for middle-grade kids, who usually range from ages 8–12.

Is the first Harry Potter movie good?

81% Critics Consensus: Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone adapts its source material faithfully while condensing the novel's overstuffed narrative into an involving -- and often downright exciting -- big-screen magical caper.

How old was Daniel Radcliffe in Harry Potter 1?

Daniel Jacob Radcliffe (born 23 July 1989) is an English actor. He rose to fame at age 12 when he began portraying Harry Potter in the film series of the same name.

How long is Harry Potter 1?

Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone (2001) - Approximately 152 minutes (2 hours and 32 minutes). Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (2002) - Approximately 161 minutes (2 hours and 41 minutes). Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (2004) - Approximately 142 minutes (2 hours and 22 minutes).

Is Snape good or bad?

Snape's true intentions were revealed in the final Harry Potter installment, showing that he was never truly evil but was instead protecting Harry from Voldemort.

How much did Daniel Radcliffe make from Harry Potter?

How much did Daniel Radcliffe make from each of the Harry Potter movies? Radcliffe's salary for each Harry Potter movie increased exponentially. His total earnings from the franchise, as previously reported, are about $95.6 million.

Why is Harry Potter rated 13?

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (2004) : Rated PG for frightening moments, creature violence and mild language. Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (2005) : Rated PG-13 for sequences of fantasy violence and frightening images.

What is the darkest Harry Potter movie?

Arguably the darkest film in the series, Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince features some of the story's most pivotal moments. The plot follows Harry as he spends more time with Dumbledore to learn more about Voldemort's story.

Which Harry Potter movie is scariest?

The Deathly Hallows – Part 1

Both Deathly Hallows movies are the culmination of the Harry Potter series and its descent into darkness. Several scenes highlight this transition, but none are scarier than the incident at Godric's Hollow.

Which Harry Potter film is the least popular?