Worldwide, it is the third-highest-grossing film of 2007, the highest-grossing film of Sam Raimi's Spider-Man trilogy, and was the highest-grossing film distributed by Sony/Columbia until 2012's Skyfall.

Is Spider-Man 3 hit or flop?

Peter Parker's Spider-Man suit turns black in this movie and his personality changes. The suit brings out the dark side of his personality. According to The New York Times, Sony Pictures revealed that Spider-Man 3 raked in $104 million, a record for a single-day gross globally back then.

Was Spider-Man 3 a box office success?

Anticipation was high for 2007's Spider-Man 3, the third chapter in Sam Raimi's Spider-Man series. While the Marvel film did exceptionally well at the box office, grossing $895 million worldwide, it was met with a divisive response from critics and audiences.

Why is Spider-Man 3 rated so low?

The biggest issue by far is the fact that there are FAR too many story lines going on at once. The movie feels very bogged down and not nearly enough time is given for proper character development. In this movie, there is Spiderman, Mary Jane, Gwen Stacey, "New" Goblin Venom and Sandman.

Will there be a Spider-Man 4?

Holland last played the superhero in 2021 blockbuster Spider-Man: No Way Home. Marvel boss Kevin Feige announced in February 2023 that the story of a fourth Spider-Man film was already set and that writers are putting pen to paper, so it could mean that the film will come sooner rather than later.

Spider-Man 3 got THIS right...

Why did Spider-Man 3 flopped?

Spider-Man 3 had too many villains, different subplots, and an overall messy plot, making it the worst movie in Raimi's trilogy, but had the production team gone with their original plan for it, Spider-Man 3 would have been even worse than it already is.

What made Spider-Man 3 bad?

Many fans have hailed it as the worst Spider-Man film, that failed to match expectations or critical reception of its predecessors. Much of the plot seemed rushed, and many critics didn't think there was enough time to develop the villains properly, which was especially obvious for the somewhat miscast Venom.

Why was Spider-Man 3 so successful?

Many things make Spider-Man 3 delightful, from Stan Lee's heartfelt cameo to Tobey Maguire fully committing to the Symbiote-influenced "Bully Parker" persona. The fact that Thomas Haden Church played Flint Marko (who's better known as Sandman) at all is also something special.

Why was Spider-Man 4 cancelled?

Despite all the rewrites, Raimi reportedly hated the scripts. He told Sony he could not meet the May 6, 2011, release date and deliver a satisfying film and decided to depart from the project. On January 11, 2010, the decision was made to scrap Spider-Man 4 entirely and reboot the franchise.

Is Venom good or bad?

Since his debut however, Venom has evolved into an antiheroic figure, slowly distancing himself from his initial goal to ruin Spider-Man's life to try and do good instead, even putting aside his differences with and helping Spider-Man at times.

Is Spider-Man 3 the most expensive movie ever made?

At the time of its release, Spider-Man 3 was the most expensive movie ever made, with some believing the budget even went past $300 million -- which Sony denied.

Who plays the best Peter Parker?

Who is the bad guy in Spider-Man 3?

It makes me happy. Edward "Eddie" Brock Jr., later known as Venom, is the main antagonist of the 2007 superhero film Spider-Man 3, the third and final installment of Sam Raimi's Spider-Man trilogy, and the main protagonist of its tie-in comic book Spider-Man 3: The Black.

What is Spiderman #3 worth?

The value of Amazing Spider-Man #3 in Mint condition has remained relatively stable over the years. In 2007, you could have picked up a CGC NM+ 9.6 copy for about $40,000. Today, you might be able to buy a copy for $55,000.

Why is Spider-Man 3 black?

At his apartment, the symbiote assimilates Peter's suit as he sleeps in it while waiting for Marko to come out of hiding. Peter awakens on top of a building, discovering that the symbiote has colored his suit black and enhanced his powers; however, it also amplifies the aggressive traits of his personality.

Why did Spider-Man 3 get Cancelled?

Why was it cancelled. Plans for an Amazing Spider-Man cinematic universe, as well as this sequel were cancelled due to the controversial Sony Hack of 2014.

Why did Spider-Man turn bad?

Following on from Non-Stop Spider-Man, the Web-Slinger's mission to apprehend the villains behind a fatal drug called "A-Plus" takes a sinister turn. After being injected with the formula by Wülf, Spider-Man's unique physiology reacts unexpectedly to the drug, transforming him into a monster more spider than man.

Why did people hate Spider-Man 3?

In addition to criticism about its messy plot, Spider-Man 3 has been criticized for having too many villains, which resulted in underdeveloped characters and even created a couple of plot holes.

Is No Way Home better than Spider-Man 3?

As undeniably fun as Spider-Man: No Way Home's extended nostalgia-rooted franchise crisscrossing is, it ultimately ends up feeling a bit hollow as a resolution for Peter Parker's story across this trilogy and pales in comparison to the only other threequel Spider-Man ever got: Sam Raimi's Spider-Man 3.

Why did Andrew Garfield not get a third Spider-Man movie?

A third and fourth film were already announced, but with the box office underperformance of The Amazing Spider-Man 2, coupled with a leaked information about the studio's displeasure at Garfield's behaviour on one occasion in particular, it was decided that the franchise should be rebooted.

What movie was #1 the longest?

E.T. sits atop with 16 weeks at number one (31% of a year). The largest number of films in a year is six in 1986 and 1992.

What is the #1 best movie ever?

Citizen Kane (1941), starring and directed by Orson Welles, has topped several international polls, including five consecutive decades at number 1 in the British Film Institute's Sight and Sound decennial poll of critics.

Who is the highest-paid actor?

Adam Sandler's four film projects of 2023 propelled him to an annual salary of $73m (£57m), making him the highest-paid performer in Hollywood, according to Forbes magazine.