Both cameras shot through a beam splitter, so that they would be shooting images from the proximity of two human eyes. As excited as Cameron was for the 3D advancements he oversaw on Avatar, he was disappointed with the majority of 3D films that followed in its wake.
He put together a crazy 3D camera rig to shoot Avatar: The Way of Water, which utilized two Sony Venice cinema cameras. This video from Frame Voyager breaks it all down, as well as the history behind some of the groundbreaking cameras Cameron has used in the past.
The film made extensive use of new motion capture filming techniques and was released for traditional viewing, 3D viewing (using the RealD 3D, Dolby 3D, XpanD 3D, and IMAX 3D formats), and "4D" experiences in selected South Korean theaters.
How Avatar’s VFX Became So Realistic | Movies Insider | Insider
Why is Avatar so popular 3D?
One of the biggest reasons for Avatar's success was its groundbreaking use of 3D technology. The film was shot using a new type of 3D camera that was specifically designed for the film, giving it a more immersive and realistic feel.
No, James Cameron's Avatar 2 Won't Use Glasses-Free 3D - 'It's Part of the Experience' Avatar: The Way of Water producer Jon Landau explains why 3D glasses are an important part of the viewing experience for the upcoming film.
Do you need 3D glasses to watch Avatar: The Way of Water?
PLEASE NOTE: SESSIONS IN 3D HAVE THE 3D SYMBOL BESIDE THE SESSION TIME (You will also need to purchase 3D glasses for everyone if you do not bring your own for the 3D session.
Yes, but it depends on what you're after. So, the 3D effects are fairly notable. That makes sense because I believe that's one of the main attractions (other than a decent story) that made the first film the highest grossing film.
All in all, plenty of fans report that AVATAR 3D doesn't necessarily deliver a more immersive or exciting experience over 2D. They're both great. And many of the bugs and errors are obvious in the 3D version of the movie are definitely not as noticeable in AVATAR 2D.
Plainly, the major reason why Avatar 2 took so long is the long pre-production state, a result of Cameron's commitment to the special effects that set Avatar apart from other films of its time to begin with.
5D Cinema is a form of film art expression developed on the basis of 4D Cinema. It contains all the functions of 4D theater. 5D theater uses seat effects and environmental effects to simulate lightning and thunder, wind, frost, rain and snow, and explosion impact.
They have existed in some form since 1915, but had been largely relegated to a niche in the motion picture industry because of the costly hardware and processes required to produce and display a 3D film, and the lack of a standardized format for all segments of the entertainment business.
The Sensorium is regarded as the world's first commercial 4D film and was first screened in 1984 at Six Flags Power Plant in Baltimore. It was produced in partnership with Landmark Entertainment.
Like the original “Avatar,” the follow-up's success is attributed to its generation-spanning appeal as well as the incentive to watch the film in premium and 3D formats. On Imax screens, the movie has crossed $250 million.
Avatar utilizes 60% CGI imagery, with a majority of the CG character animation filmed with revolutionary new motion-capture techniques using live actors. The other 40% of the film utilizes the traditional techniques of live-action imagery. James Cameron began to work on Avatar since the early 1990s.
While all of these are thoughtful explanations of why Avatar does well, the simplest and perhaps most persuasive explanation is that people want to see movies that are made for theaters in theaters. When Avatar came out in 2009, it was a flock-to-the-theater event. Since then, moviegoing culture has changed.
One of the most obvious aspects of “Avatar” that made it stand out so much was the technological achievements that it made. While CGI and 3-D technology had been used before, nobody had used them to the level that Cameron did.
It ultimately depends on your personal preferences. If you're looking for an immersive experience that makes you feel like you're part of the action, 3D might be the way to go. However, if you want the best possible image quality and a consistently impressive experience, IMAX is the clear winner.
The problem is that, as you know if you've ever picked up a pair of the RealD glasses that you use for a film like this, it considerably darkens the picture simply because of the 3D technology. You can see it — they are literally dark glasses, and as sunglasses would do, they make the picture look, you know, darker.
