Why the Time Turner Couldn't Have Saved Harry's Parents | Fandom. The time turner couldn't have been used to save Harry's parents because it was too far back in time; you cannot go back more than five hits without there being very bad consequences. They saved Buckbeak because he was about to die three hours before.
Why couldn't Harry use the Time-Turner to save Sirius?
He wouldn't have thought about using Time-Turners. Sirius would resist. If Harry appeared randomly and tried to save Sirius, he would be suspicious of some kind of Dark Magic. Or, if he didn't get suspicious, he would turn the tables and try to protect Harry, at which point nothing would be different.
Why didn't they use the Time-Turner in Harry Potter?
Time-turners were only used in "Prisoner of Azkaban" to save Sirius, raising questions about their potential and limitations. J.K. Rowling addressed the time-turner plot holes by introducing limitations on time travel and ultimately destroying all time-turners.
Why couldn t they use the Time-Turner to stop Voldemort?
These instances followed Rowling's stance on self-fulfilling prophecies. With the established Harry Potter time travel rules, Harry and his friends never had the option of traveling back in the past to kill Voldemort. If they were to do so, Voldemort would already be dead in the present timeline.
What if The Malfoy's Saw That Harry's Relatives Making Him do all the chores? |Drarry?|
Why didn't Hermione use the Time-Turner to save Harry's parents?
The time turner couldn't have been used to save Harry's parents because it was too far back in time; you cannot go back more than five hits without there being very bad consequences. They saved Buckbeak because he was about to die three hours before.
Honestly, Hermione knew Dobby was a lost case... nothing could have revived Dobby after the attack or she would have definitely helped Harry with Dobby considering she was the girl who started S.P.E.W(Society for the Elfish welfare) and fought for elf rights. There was nothing to be done at that point.
Eventually, the Time-Turner proved too much for Hermione to handle, and she ended up giving the device back to McGonagall. It's unclear if other students were eventually able to use one for similar purposes, but it's hard to imagine someone as capable as Hermione coming along and requiring one.
If Hogwarts has 8 periods per day, 5 per week, that leads Hermione to use the time turner 12 times per day. A standard week is 168 hours long, but now her's is 228 hours, and that's only if she uses the time turner for her classes, not for anything else.
Albus Dumbledore seemed to set Harry up for death in Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, but clues from earlier in the series show he always knew the boy would survive. The headmaster was always something of a question mark in the Harry Potter series since it was never quite clear what he did or didn't know.
The fact that Fawkes, who sacrificed to save Dumbledore's life at the Battle of the Department of Mysteries, didn't come to his aid at the Battle of the Astronomy Tower hints to the true nature of the headmaster's death, meaning Fawkes may understand he was killed by his own orders.
Upon looking into Dumbledore's manipulative ways and his intense plans, the most likely reason Dumbledore did not help Sirius is that the result would have interfered with his plans for Harry. Had Sirius not been sent to Azkaban, he would have been Harry's legal guardian instead of the Dursleys.
The prolonged misery of being exposed to dementors kept the prisoners locked within their own minds, so Sirius lost the ability to transform. However, Sirius explained that the knowledge of his innocence kept him sane in a way most of Azkaban's prisoners were not.
Sirius wasn't mean to Harry. He was just depressed that even the Headquarter of the Order of the Phoenix was in his own house, he couldn't contribute to it. Sirius was an extremely energetic man. Rebellion was in his blood.
What would have happened if Harry lived with Sirius?
Therefore, if Harry had gone to live with Sirius while he was still underage, he would not be safe from Voldemort. The miserable years he spent with the Dursleys would have been for nothing and he would be without the protective shield of his mother's blood.
Snape had the potential to be useful; Sirius didn't… Dumbledore didn't know for certain that Sirius was innocent, and for the most part, it didn't matter. Sirius wasn't useful.
Why didn't they use Time-Turner to stop Voldemort?
In conclusion, Harry couldn't go back time and kill Voldemort because of the Novikov's Self-Consistency principle and how the Time-Turner works in the Predestination Timeline.
In the film, she only hugs Harry, and just gives a hesitant handshake to Ron (Note: This was the result of Emma Watson being hesitant to hug both Daniel Radcliffe and Rupert Grint in public view, with her hugging Radcliffe during filming having to be frozen for a few seconds to get the desired effect due to Watson ...
Behind the scenes. In Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1, Bellatrix carves the word "Mudblood" into Hermione's arm with her knife during her interrogation due to Emma Watson and Helena Bonham Carter coming up with the idea on spare notice.
They know she's an impostor. They've been warned", so obviously the request for the wand was unexpected even to him. It's thus pretty safe to conclude that the real Bellatrix had reported her wand stolen and alerted Gringotts prior to the trio's attempted break in.
Hermione explains that the hourglass is a Time-Turner; she has been using it all year to get to all her classes. Professor McGonagall instructed her to tell no one about it.
Therefore, Snape could have accused Harry and Hermione that they used it to go back in time to free Sirius if he'd known about the time-turner. So the only teachers who knew about it would be Dumbledore and McGonagall.
After the Mintumble incident, the Department of Mysteries terminated such experiments, and Ministry of Magic laws dramatically restricted the use of time-turners.
