The Big Picture John Carpenter's The Thing is considered one of the best horror remakes ever made, surpassing the original film in its adherence to the source material and its unforgettable practical effects.

Which is better, The Thing 1982 or 2011?

As a revolutionary horror sci-fi film, John Carpenter's original The Thing is held in higher regard than the 2011 prequel for these five reasons. John Carpenter's The Thing released in 1982 to poor reception but has since been revered as a cult classic, ranking among some of the most well-known and best horror movies.

Which is better, the original it or the new one?

Over all verdict: This is a tough one. I'm gonna say in this case that the remake wins, but it's kind of by default. It had the advantage of two movies to tell the story over and to go into more depth with the characters.

Why did The Thing 2011 flop?

When the movie was finally released, it received mixed reviews and was a box office flop, with some blaming the poor computer effects, and others simply for the story and characters being inferior to the original.

Is the original "the thing" good?

Audience Reviews

Its the 80s and John Carpenter is the director, what more is there to say ? Content collapsed. This is one of the best Sci-fi horror movies of all time. From the atmosphere of the antarctic, to the beautiful practical effects, and solid acting, you can't go wrong with watching this movie.

The Real Reason The Thing (1982) is Better than The Thing (2011)

How many F bombs are in The Thing?

LANGUAGE 6 - About 15 F-words and its derivatives, 2 sexual references, 9 scatological terms, 1 anatomical term, 7 mild obscenities, name-calling (overzealous guys, demons, weasel), exclamations (bloody), 2 religious profanities, 8 religious exclamations (some of the obscenities are seen as subtitles and spoken in ...

Can a 12 year old watch The Thing 1982?

The film also contains frequent swearing. Kurt Russell's character is an amazing role model, as he displays fantastic leadership, keeps people together in a time of mistrust, and is not afraid to put his life on the line to protect his friends. Would definitely recommend to give a watch, just not for kids under 13!

Why was The Thing remake bad?

The Special Effects of 'The Thing (2011)' Are Its Fatal Flaw

Although we yearn for the glory days of the iconic head-spider puppet and tactile authenticity, practical effects are more impractical these days due to time constraints and labor.

What movie flopped the hardest?

As of February 2024, the four biggest movie flops of all time were Disney productions. "Turning Red" (2022), "Jungle Cruise" (2021), "Mars Needs Moms" (2011), and "Mulan" (2020) recorded losses of more than 140 million U.S. dollars at the global box office.

Which is scarier, IT 1990 or IT 2017?

In my opinion, the new Pennywise is a lot scarier. There are major music differences between the two films as well. The old version specifically use music so it is easy to predict when something will jump out on the screen. It is meant to make the moment suspenseful, but it comes off as cheesy.

Is IT 1990 ok for a 12 year old?

Also, the violence and gore is limited, since it is made for television. If your kid is in their early teens or even just shy of being a teenager, there is nothing in this movie that they cannot handle.

Did Stephen King like the new IT movies?

Just prior to the release of IT, King offered effusive praise for the film, and he's said nothing to backtrack on that since.

Is The Thing Scary 1982?

Parents need to know that this movie is graphically violent, gory, grisly, and frightening, though it's so over-the-top and dated that the gore is almost campy. Humans and dogs are the victims of monstrous alien beings attempting to destroy them.

Which is better, Halloween or The Thing?

Despite Halloween's ultimate success and wider appeal, The Thing featured a greater depth of filmmaking, had some amazing special effects for its time, and featured what might now be thought of as a courageous plot, given the pessimistic aura of its political and economic climate at the time.

Which actor has never had a flop?

Is there an actor/actress who never had a flop movie in their entire career? Sure — John Cazale. Primarily a stage actor, he only appeared in five films before dying of lung cancer at age 42.

What is the most unpopular movie?

Which movie has most vulgar scenes?

Was The Thing remake any good?

Being a prequel, this movie definitely had something to live up to, as Carpenter's original version is nothing short of a masterpiece. This 2011 prequel actually did a good job, and I think it was a good addition to Carpenter's work. What impressed me was the creature effects.

Is The Thing remake bad?

as some of the other reviews mention: many people may have confused this as a remake when it's actually a prequel. the cgi is not that great, and it would have been nice to see some practical effects to honor carpenter's original work, but theres basically nothing wrong with this film.

Was Childs infected at the end of The Thing?

Cundey suggested that throughout the film a specific light gleam can be seen in the eyes of whichever body is currently inhabiting the alien. A light gleam can be seen in Childs' eyes in the final scene, which would mean he's infected with the Thing under Cundey's theory.

Are there jumpscares in The Thing?

The movie is very tense because paranoia is the main theme, as no one knows who is human or alien. Several jump-scares that come out of nowhere. The aliens are disturbing to look at. They are basically a mixed up pile of body parts with a head and tentacles.

Why was The Thing badly received?

The Thing was not always as well-received as it is now. Upon its 1982 release, The Thing was panned by many critics, who nicked the film for its supposedly shallow characterization and over-reliance on gory, gross-out sequences.

Who is infected at the end of The Thing?

As The Thing follows MacReady's perspective, it's not likely that he was secretly assimilated. Of the two, Childs is far more likely to have been infected, but the nature of the Thing makes it impossible for either man to trust the other. However, the most likely eventuality is that neither man is infected.