As a revolutionary horror sci-fi film, John Carpenter's original The Thing is held in higher regard than the 2011 prequel for these five reasons. John Carpenter's The Thing released in 1982 to poor reception but has since been revered as a cult classic, ranking among some of the most well-known and best horror movies.
This is one of the best Sci-fi horror movies of all time. From the atmosphere of the antarctic, to the beautiful practical effects, and solid acting, you can't go wrong with watching this movie. It has action, horror and suspence all rolled into a great horror movie.
The Thing prequel directly leads into the '82 film during its end credits as a Norwegian helicopter pilot (Ole Martin Aune Nilsen) touches down at the ghostly camp and begins calling out for any survivors amongst the smoldering ruins.
John Carpenter's The Thing is considered one of the best horror remakes ever made, surpassing the original film in its adherence to the source material and its unforgettable practical effects.
The Real Reason The Thing (1982) is Better than The Thing (2011)
Why did the thing 2011 flop?
When the movie was finally released, it received mixed reviews and was a box office flop, with some blaming the poor computer effects, and others simply for the story and characters being inferior to the original.
'The Thing's Practical Effects Were Replaced With CGI
Despite how proudly Heijningen Jr. and his team would boast about using practical over digital effects, Universal was concerned they would make the film look dated and demanded they be almost entirely replaced with CGI.
Critics both praised the special effects achievements and criticized their visual repulsiveness, while others found the characterization poorly realized. The film grossed $19.6 million during its theatrical run.
Parents need to know that this movie is graphically violent, gory, grisly, and frightening, though it's so over-the-top and dated that the gore is almost campy. Humans and dogs are the victims of monstrous alien beings attempting to destroy them.
Cundey suggested that throughout the film a specific light gleam can be seen in the eyes of whichever body is currently inhabiting the alien. A light gleam can be seen in Childs' eyes in the final scene, which would mean he's infected with the Thing under Cundey's theory.
It hit all of the major pressure points of fear, tweaking the amygdala and triggering a response so palpable that many viewers could only look back with disgust. And if that were not enough, The Thing's meditation on despair was simply too much for audiences and critics.
The film contains a bloodbath when it comes to violence, as characters are shot, eaten, dismembered, etc. The film also contains unfortunate animal deaths with dogs, as none of them survive. The film also contains frequent swearing.
The movie was shot in British Columbia, the United States, and Alaska. The shooting of the movie also took place at Universal Studios Hollywood. The movie was filmed in Juneau, Hyder, Salmon Glacier, Kimberley, Stewart, Universal Studios Hollywood, and Tongass National Forest.
The final scene of the 2011 version even leads directly into the opening shots of 1982's The Thing. As predicted, the vast majority of the prequel's characters are dead by the time credits roll, though Winstead's Kate has managed to (at least temporarily) stop the monster from escaping Antarctica in its spaceship.
To many horror enthusiasts, John Carpenter's The Thing (1982) is considered one of the classics due to the practical effects and ominous music used throughout the movie, however, many older individuals and critics often oppose this categorization of this film, saying there is no purpose for the gruesome details shown ...
LANGUAGE 6 - About 15 F-words and its derivatives, 2 sexual references, 9 scatological terms, 1 anatomical term, 7 mild obscenities, name-calling (overzealous guys, demons, weasel), exclamations (bloody), 2 religious profanities, 8 religious exclamations (some of the obscenities are seen as subtitles and spoken in ...
Upon its 1982 release, The Thing was panned by many critics, who nicked the film for its supposedly shallow characterization and over-reliance on gory, gross-out sequences. In his interview with Carpenter, Colbert also posed that perhaps the release of Steven Spielberg's E.T.
The film was about the end of the world. Its bleakness was the reason it wasn't a success at the time, but I think also why it has endured. In fact the film was an enormous failure.
John Carpenter's "The Thing" is one of the most entertaining horror films ever made – fast, clever and purely exciting from start to finish. This is how all movies of the genre should be made. Taking place in the Antarctic in 1982, the movie focuses specifically on a group of American scientists.
Despite Halloween's ultimate success and wider appeal, The Thing featured a greater depth of filmmaking, had some amazing special effects for its time, and featured what might now be thought of as a courageous plot, given the pessimistic aura of its political and economic climate at the time.
The producers convinced Universal Studios to allow them to create a prequel to John Carpenter's The Thing (1982) instead of a remake, as they felt Carpenter's film was already perfect, so making a remake would be like "painting a mustache on the Mona Lisa".
In "The Thing (1982)" How were the aliens moved and brought to life? All of the effects in The Thing were practical and done in-camera. Back then, there were no CGI elements, and I don't think optical compositing as used much. The creatures were effectively puppets created by Rob Botin.
