It was two-three times larger than DS1 and took far more materials to build it. Sid also wanted it to look unfinished so he could lure the Rebels in: “it's a trap!” But he ensured the planet killer gun was operational by sending Vader in to oversee it.
Before its destruction, the Death Star II's superstructure was still incomplete. Large sections of the outer hull were still missing, exposing the inner decks still under construction.
The Empire's Second Death Star didn't have thermal exhaust ports, meaning it would have lacked that weakness. Fortunately, the battle-station was only partially completed, allowing the rebel ships to fly directly through the structure and destroy the reactor.
Essentially, the Empire was able to build the second Death Star so quickly because they'd already built one before. Furthermore, Darth Sidious expedited the construction of the second Death Star so that it was functional far sooner than the first.
What is the difference between the Death Star 1 and 2?
The second Death Star is substantially more advanced and more powerful than its predecessor, and the critical weakness found in the first Death Star has been removed—the Rebel Alliance's only hope is to destroy it prior to its completion.
The REAL REASONS Palpatine leaked the Second Death Star BEFORE it was finished
Why is the Death Star 2 broken?
Lando and Wedge Antilles (in an X-wing) both flew inside the superstructure, knocking out its main reactor and finally destroying Death Star II. Large pieces of the second Death Star landed in the oceans of the moon Kef Bir, poisoning the waters around them.
For other uses, see Death Star (disambiguation). The Death Star III, also known as the third Death Star, was a mock Death Star battle station created from an incomplete worldcraft by the Kaarenth Dissension.
It was two-three times larger than DS1 and took far more materials to build it. Sid also wanted it to look unfinished so he could lure the Rebels in: “it's a trap!” But he ensured the planet killer gun was operational by sending Vader in to oversee it.
The third main advancement in the second Death Star battle station was that it now carried three hypermatter reactors, two of which were used solely for the Superlaser Mk. II, making it immensely more powerful than the Superlaser Mk.
Out of the 2 billion inhabitants on Alderaan - with the modern-day populations of China and India having about 2.8 billion people combined - about 60,000 survived the destruction of the planet due to being outside of its star system at the time.
Which is more powerful the Death Star or Starkiller Base?
Even if one were to look only at the portion of the planet that is used as a base of operations, Starkiller Base is still said to be roughly two times larger than the Death Star at a minimum. Rather than wiping out a single planet, this bulky but slow superweapon was capable of destroying whole star systems.
But what made the Death Star particularly menacing was its ability to travel through hyperspace. Not only was it equipped with destructive armaments, it could pursue its prey with those armaments.
The Death Star 1 carried about 1.2 million crew members, as did the Death Star 2. This means that in total, 2.4 million Imperials died on both Death Stars.
Geonosis was the site chosen for construction of the Death Star by the newly established Empire. Travel to the planet was limited to supply convoys and high-ranking Imperials privy to the secret project to build the galaxy's ultimate weapon. The Empire sterilized Geonosis, killing almost all life on its surface.
The wiki page for starwars.fandom.com/wiki/Starkiller_Base says it's 660 km wide—tiny for a planet, but curiously the same size as starwars.fandom.com/wiki/Ilum... I looked it up and the Star Wars fandom wiki told me it was 830 km. Also it's technically a dwarf planet.
After a successful attack on the Death Star II's reactor during the battle of Endor, the ruins of the destroyed battle station subsequently fell to the surface of the ocean moon Kef Bir. The Alliance Fleet had also set up tractor beams and shields to protect the forest moon from debris.
The planning for the second Death Star began before the first one was even finished. The Empire had all the resources and labor necessary to quickly construct the second Death Star much faster than the first. The Empire's obsession with Death Stars shows the true nature of its evil.
Is the Death Star 2 better than the first Death Star? If completed, the Death Star 2 would be much better than it's predecessor. For one, its superlaser could fire every three minutes, instead of once per day. This allowed it to be effective in a space battle, as it could target capital ships easily.
Utilizeing the advances made for the Second Death Star, the Third Death Star was equipped with an advanced axial Superlaser that in combination with the power core of the Death Star could not only destroy planets, but also through controlled use of power could target capital ships as well.
Ewok lovers got a straw to grasp recently, however: Trailers for the new film "Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker," which comes out nationwide Friday (Dec. 20), have shown a large chunk of the Death Star II in the oceans of Kef Bir, one of Endor's neighbor moons.
Some Expanded Universe sources state much smaller figures—120 kilometers for the first Death Star and 160 kilometers for the second—however, most of the evidence argues for the larger sizes.
The Rebels launched a desperate attack, and a young pilot named Luke Skywalker -- strong with the Force -- flew an X-wing down the Death Star's trench, making the impossible shot. The space station was destroyed, and Tarkin with it.
