This is why Harry stabbing Tom's diary instantly destroys it in Harry Potter And The Chamber Of Secrets. However, in the same book, Harry is also pierced by the Basilisk's fang when he fights the monster.
In both the book and the movie, there wasn't enough time for the venom to reach Harry's heart, Fawkes heals him before that. In the book, Fawkes flies to Harry instantly, it doesn't lose anytime. Fawkes heals Harry before Harry stabs the diary.
Why did the basilisk Fang not destroy Harry's Horcrux?
Fawkes healed him w/his tears. Yall this question is easily answered by the fact that he didn't die and was healed by fawkes. bc harry has to actually die in order for it to be destroyed....
The only way to destroy the Horcrux inside Harry is by killing Harry, which is the equivalent of destroying beyond repair. Harry didn't died in the chamber of secrets because although the Basiliks is poisonous Fawkes saved him. So an alive Harry means that the Horcrux is still there.
Why the Horcrux in Harry Wasn't Destroyed by the Basilisk [Harry Potter Explained]
How did Harry know to stab the diary with the Fang?
In the book, it says that Harry looked at the diary and the fang he happened to have in his hand, and just suddenly knew to stab it, “As if it is what he had come here to do.” It was entirely intuitive.
The Basilisk could only be controlled by the Heir of Slytherin, Tom Riddle. Other Parselmouths (such as Harry Potter) had no control over her, though they still could understand her. Aragog (a rare Acromantula) was accused of being the monster of the chamber by Tom Riddle which sent Hagrid to Azkaban.
After being healed, Harry took the fang and stabbed Riddle's diary, destroying that Horcrux beyond magical repair. Because Harry had stabbed the Basilisk with the sword, it was imbued with Basilisk venom, and was therefore able to destroy Horcruxes as well.
Notably, Voldemort appeared to be entirely unaware of this split, as he later created a seventh Horcrux in his quest to have six, and continued to target Harry Potter despite him now holding part of Voldemort's own soul.
When Nagini bit Harry at Godric's Hollow while coming out of her disguise as Bathilda Bagshot, it is unknown how dittany was capable of stopping the bleeding, when Arthur and Snape both bled unstoppably, with Snape actually dying from it.
Harry Potter, Ron Weasley, and Gilderoy Lockhart came to the rescue. Ron and Lockhart were stuck behind an avalanche of stone, so the battle was fought mostly by Harry. Harry managed to defeat both the Basilisk and the memory of Tom Riddle, thus saving Ginny's life.
It also needed to be recovered "under conditions of need and valour". To fulfil these conditions, Snape deposited the real sword in a frozen lake in the Forest of Dean and used his corporeal Doe Patronus to guide Harry to the sword.
As a Parselmouth, Harry can easily communicate with Basilisk but I don't think he could controlled it as if he has the Basilisk under his will (or make it loyal to him) but more like he can influenced its behavior and take advantage to defeat it. Yes. Harry could have controlled the snake with Parseltongue.
The Sword of Godric Gryffindor is Goblin-made, and as such takes in the strengths of whatever it touches. Because of this, it can destroy horcruxes after taking in basilisk venom when Harry stabbed the Basilisk in The Chamber of Secrets.
Snape was born to Eileen Prince, a witch, and Tobias Snape, a Muggle, making him a half-blood (hence the name, "Half-Blood Prince"). This is rare for a Death Eater, as remarked in the last book, though Voldemort himself also had a Muggle father.
Dumbledore knew about Horcruxes. He knew how they were formed, what happened after that, etc. He probably got to know Harry was a Horcrux when he saw the Scar on Harry's forehead, but maybe he wasn't sure.
The prophecy is mentioned throughout the series, however, it never exclusively mentions that Harry is The Chosen One and suggests Neville was another option. However, one theory explains why, in reality, this wasn't possible.
Why was Harry's horcrux not destroyed by the basilisk?
As Hermione explains in The Deathly Hallows, a Horcrux is reliant upon its container for survival. To destroy a Horcrux, you have to damage whatever it lives in beyond magical repair. Fawkes healed Harry, so the Horcrux survived as well.
The basilisk was their greatest threat due to its killing gaze and the fact that spiders had many eyes and an extreme field of view, thus making them highly vulnerable targets.
In the film adaptation of Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets, in the Duelling Club scene, Harry says three phrases to the snake, which are as follows: "You are to listen (to me)/obey" "You are to stop" "I command you to stop"
Why didn't Harry use Parseltongue to control the Basilisk?
Of course, at that moment, Harry Potter didn't know there was a piece of Voldemort's soul in him, so he wouldn't have even tried to communicate with the Basilisk, but had he tried and succeeded at it, Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets would have ended very differently.
Harry is the Heir of Gryffindor (though his powers have been bound by his father when he was a baby), Neville is the Heir of Hufflepuff, Meghan (OFC, daughter of Sirius) is the Heir of Ravenclaw.
How did Hermione avoid getting killed by the Basilisk?
Hermione was Petrified after seeing the Basilisks' eyes in a hand mirror. Petrification seemed quite powerful, as the legendary Albus Dumbledore concluded that the only way to reverse the effect was through the use of the Mandrake Restorative Draught.
