The sequel suffered from a lack of continuity, with only a few cast members returning and important characters being absent. Exorcist II: The Heretic is widely regarded as one of the worst sequels and films ever made, with laughable dialogue, incomprehensible plot, and unconvincing special effects.

Why was The Exorcist 2 so bad?

And the acting, the lines and the music is awful. The plot makes no sense what so ever. Nothing ever happens. Instead of Reagan being possessed once again or a whole new cast we get a dumb boring story about an investigation of what really happened to Father Merrin when he exorcised the deamon in the original.

Is The Exorcist part 2 good?

Variety wrote, "Exorcist II is not as good as The Exorcist. It isn't even close." BBC film critic Mark Kermode stated "Exorcist II is demonstrably the worst film ever made. It took the greatest film ever made and trashed it in a way that was on one level farcically stupid and on another level absolutely unforgivable.

How scary is The Exorcist 2?

Until the last 15 minutes, there is nothing horrific, scary, or even unsettling. As a lover of films, and specifically a lover of bad films, this was nearly unwatchable and had me checking the time every few minutes in a fight to turn it off early.

Are The Exorcist sequels any good?

'The Exorcist' Lives Up to the Legacy of the Original

Even more so when the majority of The Exorcist's theatrical sequels were disappointing to fans (a notable exception is The Exorcist III or alternately titled Legion).

Is This The Worst Horror Sequel? | Exorcist II: Heretic (1977) | RGP Review

Does Exorcist 3 ignore Exorcist 2?

When that fell apart, Blatty turned its story into the 1983 novel Legion. And when the time came to turn Legion into a film, Blatty, who had director approval, ultimately decided to direct it himself. Unsurprisingly, The Exorcist III essentially ignores Heretic.

Do I need to see Exorcist 2 before 3?

Nothing directly contradicts Exorcist II: The Heretic in The Exorcist III, but the first sequel is rightly considered so awful that some fans want to wipe it from existence. The third movie certainly doesn't contain any direct links to it, so it's easy to skip from the first to the third movie if you want.

Is The Exorcist 3 bad?

It's as good as sequels come and I would recommend it to fans of the original film. One thing that people might find surprising is that it actually ties into the first Exorcist film rather well.

Which Exorcist movie was banned?

Although there was positive reception, clearly, a lot of fiasco too was involved at the release of The Exorcist. And as a result of this, the film's home sales were illegal in the U.K. for quite a few years. Even further, the trailer of the movie was pulled from screening in the American theaters.

Is Exorcist 1 and 2 connected?

Blumhouse producer says 'Exorcist: Believer' is a direct sequel to the original, and not connected to the rest of the franchise : r/horror.

Was Exorcist 3 any good?

But overall, it's a great film that really exceeded my expectations, especially in the last two acts. It's as good as sequels come and I would recommend it to fans of the original film. One thing that people might find surprising is that it actually ties into the first Exorcist film rather well.

Why is Exorcist 2 called The Heretic?

“It [Heretic] was based on Chardin's intoxicating idea that biological evolution was the first step in God's plan, starting with inert rock, and culminating in humankind.” A truly bonkers premise to base a popular blockbuster on, Boorman convinced the powers behind the movie that the only way to follow up The Exorcist ...

Is Exorcist 3 a good movie?

The Exorcist 3 excels and matching the quality delivered by the original, but delivers it in such different ways. George C. Scott and Brad Dourif create masterpieces each time they're on screen together, with the rest of the cast excelling throughout.

What is the scariest scene in The Exorcist?

The Exorcist is a horror masterpiece that traumatizes audiences with explicit and realistic scenes, causing people to faint and vomit. The scariest scene in The Exorcist is a blink-and-you'll-miss-it moment during Father Karras's first meeting with the possessed Regan, which is filled with intent and scope.

Is Exorcist 3 related to Exorcist 2?

Directed by Exorcist author and screenwriter William Peter Blatty, 1990's Exorcist III ignores The Exorcist II: The Heretic and presents a direct follow-up to the original. In some ways, it resembles a legacy sequel, but in others, it's more than happy to go in weirder directions.

Why was The Exorcist banned in the US?

Why was The Exorcist banned? The film gained notoriety after it was supposedly provoked audience members to faint, vomit and even suffer heart attacks.

What is the most banned movie?

Which horror movie is banned in the world?

The Human Centipede was banned altogether from Icelandic, British, and Australian theaters and released in the US without a rating. Its sequel, The Human Centipede 2, was placed under even heavier bans, due to its exacerbation of the horrific elements in the first film.

What scene was removed from The Exorcist?

The Exorcist spider walk scene, initially deleted from the film's release, was restored later, delighting fans who consider it a favorite sequence. Director William Friedkin felt the scene was a big special effect too early in the story, but later reinserted the scene using CGI to erase wires.

Which exorcist is the best one?

1 'The Exorcist' (1973)

To no one's surprise, the original Exorcist stands tall as the greatest film in the series it kicked off. This is a landmark film within the horror genre, and arguably the greatest movie the late William Friedkin ever made.

How disturbing is The Exorcist?

Expect extreme gore, grotesque effects (bulging eyes, sores, etc.), and scares, and two important characters die. A girl repeatedly stabs her crotch with a cross and crawls a flight of stairs upside down, turning her head completely around.

Who is the serial killer in Exorcist?

Paul Bateson (born August 24, 1940) is an American convicted murderer and former radiographer. He appeared as a radiologic technologist in a scene from the 1973 horror film The Exorcist, which was inspired when the film's director, William Friedkin, watched him perform a cerebral angiography the previous year.

Is The Exorcist 2 canon?

Though the film serves as a direct follow-up to the original, Green confirmed that each of the franchise installments are still canon to his new film. In July 2021, it was revealed that a trilogy of sequels were in development with David Gordon Green attached as director on each film.

Is The Exorcist ok for 13 year olds?

VIOLENCE/GORE 7 - There are many very intense and scary scenes: the possessed 12-year-old girl's face becomes increasingly pale and streaked with bloody lacerations, and her eyes begin to redden and sometimes roll back (in a later scene we realize that her whole body has been affected); her voice becomes very low and ...

Is Exorcist 3 connected to Exorcist?

The Exorcist III is set fifteen years after the events of The Exorcist (1973). The film follows a character from the original film, Lieutenant William F. Kinderman, who investigates a series of demonic murders in Georgetown that have the hallmarks of the Gemini, a deceased serial killer.