The third movie in the series and the only one not to feature Voldemort, Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban is (undeservedly) the lowest-earning movie out of the series.

What is the least liked Harry Potter movie?

Which Harry Potter has the worst ratings?

Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald (2018)

It's the lowest ranked Harry Potter movie of them all, not just here, but on Metacritic (the only one that matters), with a measly 52%.

Was there a bad Harry Potter movie?

(Photo: Warner Bros.) Crimes of Grindelwald is the only genuinely bad movie in the Harry Potter franchise. Its sequel, Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore, may not be as good as the mainline Harry Potter films, but it's not a bad movie by any stretch.

Which Harry Potter movie left out the most?

Prisoner of Azkaban dropped the highly important Quidditch plot, began the tradition of “Hermione first, Ron never,” and, worst, missed the point of the book: Moony, Wormtail, Padfoot and Prongs were Harry's father and his friends.

Best Harry Potter Movies Ranked (2001 - 2022)

How many times was Harry Potter declined?

J.K. Rowling's original 'Harry Potter' pitch was rejected 12 times — see it in new exhibit. A new exhibit in the British Library features a number of magical delights!

Why did they leave so much out of the Harry Potter movies?

Because film is a visual medium and after Columbus the directors took more artistic freedoms and the screenwriter instead correctly focused more on Harry Potter himself and trimmed the fat of all the massive amounts of side plots and kept things that were only essential to the main storyline of the book involving Harry ...

Who turned out to be bad in Harry Potter?

Voldemort makes his debut in Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone. In this story, Rowling introduces him as the Dark Lord who tried to kill Harry Potter because the boy was prophesied to destroy him.

Why is the Prisoner of Azkaban so good?

The Big Picture

Alfonso Cuarón's direction in 'Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban' brought a mature and artistic approach to the franchise, with a blend of levity and darkness that enhanced the story's emotional weight.

Why was Harry Potter so controversial?

Harry Potter books have made headlines ever since the first installment was released in 1999. Parents and religious groups have expressed concern that these stories can not be considered a simple children's fantasy. These critics disapprove of the novels' portrayal of the occult as a positive lifestyle (Booth 310).

Is Harry Potter losing popularity?

People had taken to reading big time during the pandemic though with the health scare receding from most parts of the world, reading books is no longer as much in demand.

Who was the worst villain in Harry Potter?

Is there a better movie than Harry Potter?

The beloved Pirates Of The Caribbean franchise stretched to five films that were released between 2003 and 2017. Not even Harry Potter can beat the first three Pirates films, which carry an atmosphere of magic and adventure on the seas and conclude in a tragic ending for the main characters.

What was the least successful Harry Potter?

The third movie in the series and the only one not to feature Voldemort, Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban is (undeservedly) the lowest-earning movie out of the series.

Who is the least loved character in Harry Potter?

Dudley Dursley

Harry and Dudley even have a few adventures together, most of which leave Harry at least a little satisfied to have gotten some amusement. Still, Dudley is petulant and annoying, so he's easily one of the least likable characters in the series.

What is the least financially successful Harry Potter movie?

There are two notable things about Harry Potter and the Prisoner Of Azkaban. First, it made less money than any movie with Harry Potter in it, at $789 million worldwide, despite being one of the higher totals of the Harry Potter movies budget.

How did Malfoy avoid Azkaban?

Lucius Malfoy avoided prison following Voldemort's downfall by providing evidence against fellow Death Eaters. Draco continued to love his father, but broke from the family “pure-blood” line following the war.

Why was Severus Black in Azkaban?

He was then subsequentally burnt out of the family tapestry for daring to be different. Next up: he was imprisoned in Azkaban for over a decade for the murder of 12 Muggles and his former best friend Peter Pettigrew, who actually framed him and faked his own death.

How did Draco avoid Azkaban?

It's likely that Harry, who went on to become an influential dark-wizard catcher, was willing to offer Draco a second chance (seeing as he even offered Voldemort a second chance). Harry's forgiving attitude toward Draco presumably contributed to Draco not being imprisoned.

Who betrayed the Potters in Harry Potter?

However, they all learned the truth in 1994, when Pettigrew was exposed by Sirius Black and Remus Lupin; "Scabbers" was, in fact, Peter Pettigrew, the wizard who betrayed James and Lily Potter to Lord Voldemort.

What house was Bellatrix?

At Hogwarts, she, along with her sisters, was sorted into Slytherin. It is suggested in the novels that, as a student, Bellatrix associated with a group of students – including Rodolphus Lestrange, Severus Snape, Avery, Evan Rosier and Wilkes – who nearly all became Death Eaters.

Why was Voldemort afraid of Dumbledore?

Voldemort fears Dumbledore because he knows Dumbledore is more powerful than him, having known Dumbledore and Grindelwald's duel in 1945, and he had just finished school that time. Voldemort feared suffering the same fate as Grindelwald.

Why did Emma Watson almost quit the Harry Potter movies?

In one scene, Watson, Daniel Radcliffe, and Rupert Grint all discussed the intense fame that came along with their roles, which they performed throughout their childhoods. Watson also recalled rereading a diary entry from around the same time she was considering quitting, and said it was clear she felt lonely.

Why did Disney turn down Harry Potter?

Based on past trends, it's evident Disney wasn't willing to provide the creative input necessary to maintain the quality of the Harry Potter franchise. If Disney had the Harry Potter series, the Wizarding World likely would've overstayed its welcome and perhaps lost its magic in the long run.

Why didn t Disney buy Harry Potter?

Simple answer. Harry Potter doesn't belong to Disney, it belongs to JK. Rowling. Plus, Disney wasn't the studio that made Harry Potters screenplay, it was Warner Bros.