Daniel Radcliffe earned $1 million for his role in the first Harry Potter film, with his pay increasing substantially with each sequel to a whopping $50 million for the last two movies.
Following the order of the films, in 'Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix', Daniel Radcliffe earned 14 million dollars; in 'Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince', 24 million dollars. Finally, he earned 50 million dollars in 'Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows.
Radcliffe's salary for each Harry Potter movie increased exponentially. His total earnings from the franchise, as previously reported, are about $95.6 million. Here's his estimated salary for each movie in chronological order: Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone (2001): $1 million.
In the highest-grossing spot is Harry Potter and The Deathly Hallows Part 2, the explosive and action-packed conclusion to a decade-long franchise that fans have followed obsessively.
How much did Emma Watson get paid for Harry Potter?
Her total estimated earnings for the franchise are $62 million, with $30 million of that being from Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 1 and Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2. Of the remaining $32 million, she reportedly made $4 million for Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix.
Rowling consistently makes passive income on all Harry Potter products. Multiple sources have cited that Rowling earns anywhere between $50 million to a $100 million each year from royalties.
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban marks the third film in the franchise. Despite introducing some prominent characters like Sirius Black and Remus Lupin that shaped the series, the movie missed the mark domestically and garnered the lowest box office gross.
How much was Daniel Radcliffe paid for Harry Potter?
Daniel Radcliffe earned $1 million for his role in the first Harry Potter film, with his pay increasing substantially with each sequel to a whopping $50 million for the last two movies.
How much did Daniel Radcliffe make from Harry Potter in total?
After taxes and commission and such, it's reported that Daniel amassed a $95.6 million fortune from his work on the eight Harry Potter films, which is, ya know, not too shabby.
In all the films, Daniel Radcliffe played Harry Potter, Rupert Grint played Ron Weasley and Emma Watson played Hermione Granger. When they were cast only Radcliffe had previously acted in a film.
They had about 321,000,000 galleons, about 2.2 billion dollars, and 1.6 billion pounds. They were probably some of the richest families. Overall, the Malfoys seem to be the richest and most wealthy, however, there must have been other families out there that had a plentiful amount of money as well.
Do Harry Potter actors get royalties? If so, how much? - Quora. Actors do get residuals for their work in film if the film is part of the SAG/AFTRA our union. Any film production with a signatory agreement with SAG the actors receive residuals each time the film is aired or released.
The third movie in the series and the only one not to feature Voldemort, Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban is (undeservedly) the lowest-earning movie out of the series.
Ron Weasley actor Rupert, 34, is estimated to be worth an eye-watering £50million. He runs a £23m TV business named Clay 10 as well as a property empire with his dad Nigel, according to the Daily Star.
Daniel Jacob Radcliffe (born 23 July 1989) is an English actor. He rose to fame at age 12 when he began portraying Harry Potter in the film series of the same name.
Even though Rowling has not revealed exactly how much money Harry has, it is hinted throughout the series that he has a sizable amount. He even gifts his Triwizard Tournament prize money (amounting to a thousand Galleons) to Fred and George Weasley because he doesn't “need” it.
How much money was Harry Potter left by his parents?
Since we know one galleon is equal to around $25, the minimum amount of money in Harry's vault is a mind-blowing $1,265,625! And that's the baaaaaare minimum considering that in the books, although no specifics were given, A LOT more money was depicted. Pratically Harry Potter was a millionaire.
As Ilovecats13 and DelphianDragon said, James' father Fleamont quadrupled the family's gold by inventing Sleekeazy's Hair Potion (the same that Hermione used before the Yule Ball to tame her mane). The family fortune was passed down to James, their only child, and then onto Harry. Rowling wrote about it on Pottermore.
Does J.K. Rowling still own rights to Harry Potter?
Yes Warner Bros. owns the film rights to the Harry Potter movie series, but the character rights are entirely owned by Rowling. Because of this, Warner Bros. cannot use the characters in any other story or further the HP universe in any way we would recognize.
Edinburgh author J.K. Rowling is believed to be the world's wealthiest author, with a fortune of around $1 billion. It's all a long way from the struggling and skint single mum who started her world-conquering Harry Potter series of novels in a cafe in Scotland's capital.
Rowling, according to Celebrity Net Worth, is the first author in the world to achieve a net worth of $1 billion. Her latest book in the series under her pen name Robert Galbraith, “The Running Grave,” published in April.
