Many reasons have been cited for its failure to impress audiences: competition from films such as E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial, which offered an optimistic take on alien visitation; a summer that had been filled with successful science fiction and fantasy films; and an audience living through a recession, diametrically ...

Why did The Thing 1982 flop?

The film was about the end of the world. Its bleakness was the reason it wasn't a success at the time, but I think also why it has endured. In fact the film was an enormous failure. I got fired because of it and was out of work for a while, but slowly its reputation changed.

Why did The Thing 2011 flop?

When the movie was finally released, it received mixed reviews and was a box office flop, with some blaming the poor computer effects, and others simply for the story and characters being inferior to the original.

Why did critics hate The Thing in 1982?

Many reviewers criticized the plot and found the characters' deaths to be meaningless, the pacing to be slow, the dialogues to be “banal”, and the story to be devoid of warmth or humanity. Others found the performances of the cast to be good, but the characters being “bland” and nothing more than stereotypes.

Why was there never a sequel to The Thing?

In any case, van Heijningen Jr. never got to see the idea through to the end once his film underperformed — both critically and financially. "The Carpenter version was so good and a lot of fans were almost offended by the prequel and didn't see the necessity for a follow-up," he says.

THE THING (1982) Breakdown | Ending Explained, Why Childs Was A Thing, Theories & Hidden Details

Should I watch The Thing 1982 or 2011?

As a revolutionary horror sci-fi film, John Carpenter's original The Thing is held in higher regard than the 2011 prequel for these five reasons. John Carpenter's The Thing released in 1982 to poor reception but has since been revered as a cult classic, ranking among some of the most well-known and best horror movies.

Is there an alternate ending to The Thing?

So called "alternate ending" is added with final voiceover saying to watch others around cause who knows what tomorrow, tonight will bring. This ending is actually longer version of the opening scene with Norwegian dog escaping while their camp is in flames.

Was Blade Runner a flop?

'Blade Runner' (1982)

The most obvious example of this article can be found in one of Ridley Scott's greatest works. 'Blade Runner' failed to meet the expectations of Warner Bros. Pictures. It barely made $34 million out of a budget of $28 million.

What inspired The Thing 1982?

Development of the film began in the mid-1970s when David Foster and fellow producer Lawrence Turman suggested to Universal Pictures an adaptation of the 1938 John W. Campbell novella Who Goes There?.

Who did the special effects for The Thing 1982?

Bottin worked on The Thing seven days a week (including late nights) for a year and five weeks straight, producing every creature effect (with the exception of the transformed dog, which was partially done by Stan Winston).

What movie flopped the hardest?

As of February 2024, the four biggest movie flops of all time were Disney productions. "Turning Red" (2022), "Jungle Cruise" (2021), "Mars Needs Moms" (2011), and "Mulan" (2020) recorded losses of more than 140 million U.S. dollars at the global box office.

What is the biggest flop in Hollywood history?

Why was The Thing remake bad?

The Special Effects of 'The Thing (2011)' Are Its Fatal Flaw

Although we yearn for the glory days of the iconic head-spider puppet and tactile authenticity, practical effects are more impractical these days due to time constraints and labor.

Is The Thing remake better than the original?

John Carpenter's The Thing is considered one of the best horror remakes ever made, surpassing the original film in its adherence to the source material and its unforgettable practical effects.

Does anyone survive The Thing 1982?

The most debated aspect of The Thing concerns its two survivors, MacReady and Childs. The events of the film see every other person in Antarctic Outpost 31 killed, and the horror movie's final survivors are left in the impossible — but practically inevitable — situation where neither man knows if the other is infected.

Is The Thing worth watching 1982?

This is one of the best Sci-fi horror movies of all time. From the atmosphere of the antarctic, to the beautiful practical effects, and solid acting, you can't go wrong with watching this movie. It has action, horror and suspence all rolled into a great horror movie.

Why was The Thing badly received?

The Thing was not always as well-received as it is now. Upon its 1982 release, The Thing was panned by many critics, who nicked the film for its supposedly shallow characterization and over-reliance on gory, gross-out sequences.

Is The Thing Scary 1982?

Parents need to know that this movie is graphically violent, gory, grisly, and frightening, though it's so over-the-top and dated that the gore is almost campy. Humans and dogs are the victims of monstrous alien beings attempting to destroy them.

Why did 2049 fail?

Why Blade Runner 2049 Was a Critics-Favorite Sequel But a Box-Office Bomb. Much like the original, Blade Runner 2049 became a cult hit but failed to thrive financially due to pacing issues, murky stakes and zero fun factor.

Was Blade 2 a flop?

Blade II was released in the United States on March 22, 2002, and was a box office success, grossing over $155 million. It received mixed reviews from critics, earning praise for its performances, atmosphere, direction, and action sequences, although its script and character development have been criticized.

Why did people not like Blade Runner in 1982?

Blade Runner initially underperformed in North American theaters and polarized critics; some praised its thematic complexity and visuals, while others critiqued its slow pacing and lack of action. The film's soundtrack, composed by Vangelis, was nominated in 1982 for a BAFTA and a Golden Globe as best original score.

Was Kate right at the end of The Thing?

Like the 1982 film, the fate of the protagonist of 2011's The Thing is left vague in the movie's ending. Kate Lloyd remains in a similar position to the original's MacReady and Childs. Even if she is able to drive the other snow vehicle out across the landscape, there is no guarantee that she will find any help.

Was Childs infected at the end of The Thing?

Cundey suggested that throughout the film a specific light gleam can be seen in the eyes of whichever body is currently inhabiting the alien. A light gleam can be seen in Childs' eyes in the final scene, which would mean he's infected with the Thing under Cundey's theory.

Who was still human at the end of The Thing?

The Eye Light Theory And Carpenter's Claim

The eye light theory states that humans were marked with a light in their eyes by the film's director of photography, Dean Cundey. At the end of the film, Childs does not have the eye light, and MacReady does.