As far as film adaptations go, the IT movie is pretty faithful to Stephen King's 1986 novel. There are some deviations, though. A few characters have been tweaked slightly, and the storylines of others have been altered.
Is the ending in the IT movie the same as the book?
The epilogue of the film differs wildly from the book as well. The movie finds Bill finishing a new book, Mike deciding to finally leave Derry, Ben and Bev becoming a couple, and Richie re-carving he and Eddie's initials into a fence outside of town.
It's true that Andy Muschietti's recent It films are pretty successful adaptations of Stephen King's story, but, while the films maintain much of the novel's overarching themes and important scenes, there's an entire tome's worth of cut content that makes the book a profoundly more disturbing experience.
The book trumps the movie in sheer terror. While Tim Curry as Pennywise the Clown was traumatizing to many 80's children, the CGI monster at the end failed to live up to King's hair raising description. Don't go to the circus after reading this book.
In my opinion, the new Pennywise is a lot scarier. There are major music differences between the two films as well. The old version specifically use music so it is easy to predict when something will jump out on the screen. It is meant to make the moment suspenseful, but it comes off as cheesy.
So, what did Stephen King think of the new IT? Just prior to the release of IT, King offered effusive praise for the film, and he's said nothing to backtrack on that since. As relayed to Bloody Disgusting: I had hopes, but I was not prepared for how good it really was.
IT: Chapter 2 explored the second half of Stephen King's book, IT, and was a faithful adaptation overall, with one major difference. IT: Chapter Two was a relatively faithful adaptation to Stephen King's book, just as the first one was, but there were a few major changes that altered the course and lore of the film.
In the summer of 1989, a group of bullied kids band together to destroy a shape-shifting monster, which disguises itself as a clown and preys on the children of Derry, their small Maine town...
Is reading the book better than watching the movie based on IT?
If a novel has been turned into a film you should always read the novel first because it enchants your imagination more. Moreover, you should read the book first as the author imagined the plot the way they wrote it.
Stephen King's IT introduced readers to a one-of-a-kind creature that can take any form, the most common one being Pennywise the Dancing Clown, and as menacing as it is, this creature has one big enemy it's truly scared of: Maturin, the turtle.
Well, the simple answer would be an emphatic no. As was demonstrated in IT Chapter One, the pair were close in the book — with Richie even going on to kiss Eddie on the cheek following his sacrifice. However, there was nothing to imply that their dynamic was anything but a deep friendship.
And if his victim believes him to be powerless, he will become powerless. And so the group figures out that their best bet is, essentially, to bully the bully: They mock Pennywise, telling him he isn't scary. Humiliated, Pennywise begins to shrink, transforming into an almost Benjamin Button–like, melted clown-baby.
Movie! Flashback of the past of Pennywise and his. Daughter Kersh 🤗 Of when IT became & took over. Pennywise the Dancing Clown better known as Bob. Gray.
Parents need to know that It Chapter Two is the follow-up to the hugely successful It (2017); both films are based on Stephen King's novel. This one -- which is more centered on adults than kids -- is very long and less scary than the first, but it's definitely entertaining, with great characters and true teamwork.
Pennywise's transformations in Andy Muschietti's It movies made Bill Skarsgård's villain crueler than the books, and Stephen King liked the change. Andy Muschietti's changes to Pennywise's character in It and It: Chapter Two were approved by none other than Stephen King himself.
It Chapter Two star Jessica Chastain has claimed that the horror sequel used a record amount of fake blood during filming. Speaking at a Comic-Con panel for the new film in San Diego, the actor revealed that a total of “4,500 gallons” of fake blood was used on set.
In the novel, It claims that its true name is Robert "Bob" Gray, but decided to be named “It”. Throughout the book, It is generally referred to as male, usually appearing as Pennywise. The Losers come to believe It may be female after seeing it in the form of a monstrous giant spider that lays eggs.
To put it bluntly, the blood Bev sees is period blood. She is afraid of going through puberty and becoming a woman. She fears this because of her abusive, misogynistic father and the fact that boys and men already sexualize her.
Pennywise is a bit scarier in the remake, I enjoyed Tim Curry in the role but Bill Skarsgard's performance is more sinister and less comical which I thought was ultimately more effective for the material, that with the terrifying animation and Muschietti's direction made the character a lot more menacing.
The main reason that Art the Clown beats Pennywise when it comes to scare factor is the simplicity of his modus operandi. Without a word (and usually without betraying emotions other than sadistic glee, unless he's seriously hurt), Art the Clown just tortures, maims, and murders for no discernible reason.
Just a few years after the first filmmakers emerged in the mid-1890s, Mellies created “Le Manoir du Diable,” sometimes known in English as “The Haunted Castle” or “ The House of the Devil,” in 1896, and it is widely believed to be the first horror movie.
